Charles Malet

This Delingpod is very kindly sponsored by

Sina Crisps




Listen instead

Download MP3

A Delingpod episode

4th June 2026


Very kindly sponsored by:

Sina Crisps

In this uncharacteristically - and completely accidentally - topical podcast James finds himself talking to former Army and Police officer Charles Malet of UK Column. They chat animatedly but amiably about the issue of the hour “How can you tell who is and isn’t Controlled Opposition”, especially as it relates to l’Affaire UK Column. But first James has got a few things he wants to get off his chest about the military. Aren’t they basically mercenaries for the Cabal’s killing machine? Lots of good stuff about tanks, drones and Ukraine, too. https://www.ukcolumn.org/ UK Column & the Alternative Media scene in the UK - Debi Evans & Sandi Adams: https://actionabletruth.media/uk-column-and-the-alternative-media-scene/ The Debi Evans and Sandi Adams Allegations: A Rebuttal: https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-debi-evans-and-sandi-adams-allegations-a-rebuttal



Feedback

Comments can be posted by Special Friends and VIPs. Log in or upgrade to join the discussion.


R

rosiemrsk

8 June 2026, 10:24pm

I think there are very few "professions" that cannot be accused of having "links". We need to judge ideas not people, as far as possible. And then, use instinct to discern (not judge) in terms of the person. And remember that nobody is perfect. I find it very hard to see how anyone cannot see that Charles is genuine. I really felt for him here. Thanks to you both for this very important discussion. x
Sophie Watkins

Sophie Watkins

24 June 2026, 10:29am

In reply to rosiemrsk

I totally agree with you Rosie
Darley

Darley

24 June 2026, 12:51pm

In reply to rosiemrsk

yes, and I'm not sure how to put this sensitively but often the accusers to me, seem quite unworldly-wise and inexperienced. There is little space for nuance in the purists inquisition and there seems to be no pacifying once the process has started either because any answer, be it rational or empirical is seen as gatekeeping.

M

MR ANDREW HARRISON

15 June 2026, 4:54pm

Whilst some of the views expressed by Mr Mallet sounded to me hopelessly behind the curve, boomerish even such as the 'Anglo Saxon' civ-nattery. I nevertheless think he's a honest individual. Furthermore I found the column a useful entry point to many of the subjects covered and although now I've moved past much of the 'non-conspiracy' world view which lingers in their editorial I'm nevertheless glad they exist and think they are broadly aligned with the truth but just haven't arrived at the destination in some instances. Of course that presupposes any of us, apart from James has all the answers!
Sophie Watkins

Sophie Watkins

24 June 2026, 10:30am

In reply to MR ANDREW HARRISON

Well this is the thing isn’t it? I wonder whether normies sometimes have the answer but the so far beyond the conspiracy awake crowd refuse to recognise that due to some internal arrogance.

Sophie Watkins

Sophie Watkins

24 June 2026, 10:38am

I find the witch-hunt and the presumed guilty until proven innocent of the awake movement infuriating and arrogant and often based on how people feel about a topic.

I find the ‘awake not awake’ movement often feel anything science related must be all false but other things, especially theological - well there we can trust the experts and the scholars over the century.

Issues such as the trinity - dare I go there as this is deeply censored - (James I can feel you react as I even write questioning the trinity which I have mentioned a number of times in comments and emails) - it’s a deeply disturbing rabbit hole to go down and the cost of questioning and listening to counter arguments can be enormous - many have lost their lives for centuries with this - isn’t that worth a look at or not worth it? I struggle to see why it wouldn’t be worth it if it really is a made up theological concept to control the masses but making Jesus a God/man hybrid mix.

This is why I think there are rabbit holes that free thinkers are not so free to go down. I think we all have places we won’t go and we need to accept that. I’ve got my own places I don’t want to go and that’s reasonable.
J

jamesdelingpole

25 June 2026, 10:42am

In reply to Sophie Watkins

I totally agree with you, Sophie, on this witch hunt presumed guilty atmosphere. It's awful - and when you've been on the wrong end of it and know how stupid and misguided people can be you despair.

As to your views on the trinity, why would anyone censor it?
Sophie Watkins

Sophie Watkins

25 June 2026, 10:55am

In reply to Sophie Watkins

James I don't think I can specifically reply to you os adding the comment here and hope for the best!

Good grief - have you tried just gently asking the question? Trinity denier is honestly one of the ultimate slurs - to be fair I think it's an issue to be dealt with very very carefully as people are genuinely traumatised by Jesus potentially only being

Son of God
Son of Man
Messiah
Christ
Servant of God
Prophet
High Priest
Mediator
Man
Apostle
Teacher
Lord
Saviour
Redeemer
Good Shepherd
Lamb of God
King of Israel
King of the Jews
Prince of Life
Holy One of God
Righteous One
Beloved Son
Chosen One
Image of the Invisible God
Firstborn of All Creation
Firstborn from the Dead
Last Adam
Seed of Abraham
Seed of David
Bridegroom
Judge of the Living and the Dead

and not God himself - surely multiple gods is an antithesis to our faith?.... I heard a preach about the Trinity and chap started off by saying a creature with three heads was a monster and then carried on to repeat how confusing the Trinity was but it was ok as we have it revealed to us by faith and then we understand - I felt he didn't help himself...




DelingSTATS — Views: 602 • Unique visitors: 330



More Episodes